Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Henri

Pages: [1]
1
Correct, those are replicas. based on mine. (Or at least the series mine is from) THAT IS WHY they all sent me ebay links with fugly  'warminks'' with the same name and pics printed on steel..
instead of silver engrqaved. people are so stupid, dumb and cost me alot of time.. I hope they STFU.  Pardon my language, I am mr polite, almost always. nmd when I say I am right I am right. Just because I onlsay I am right when I know I am. 

Even the ppl from Sotheby's say: well I THINK ITS not old. next..



Everyone says, it is a replica.. Well sent me a pic of the one on which the replica's are based ;) ARE NONE.

At the end.. I have figured it all out by myself in the meailshile explaning how and why ppl are wrong.

That was not how I wish to spent my time on this site lol.

2
Hello Sir,

For a labtest they advised me to travel to amsterdam.
6 jewellers have tested it with acid. it isa at least 22k.
I just received email with a sorry from one jeweller. He heard I am invited for a national tv show:
http://cultuurgids.avro.nl/front/indextkk.html

I cant find an objective clock specialist because of the golden ornament.

I acutally closed the gold item and my next is the engraviongs. as soon a a professional supprts me with FACTS I can forward myzelf again to Christies and or Sotheby's .

They all ASSUME its not real ;)

I think I will visit the tv shor on the 5th of september and let themn figure it all out. All kind of specialsits are there. (Clock, engravings, 18th century arts, metals)

I thank you alot for your reply!

3
Entertaimnment is alwasys nice. But also offtopioc. please give some help or be quiet?
I also have an miniscule bible from 1833 in a silver box. But looking at the responses..

I will post it on my other page,   they appreciate old  stuff:
http://www.collectorsweekly.com/user/Hansel with my other 18th century silverwork. anyway. thanks alot people.

Please forgive me, but is it bad that I'm finding this thread entertaining? =)

4
Wow  !
I have searched soo long. thanks!

This is very cool, it was made by an company that also made medical tools..
I was looking and pointed in that direction.

5
Antique Questions Forum / Silver work. Additional info needed.
« on: August 06, 2012, 12:22:54 pm »
Does anyone has an idea what this was for? And from which time and where?

It looks like there is a glass or some pottery is missing.

Maybe for chocolates?

6
The beautifull vases are handpainted.
And there is a fj111. on the bottom (see image)

If you have extra info, please let me know.

7
SORRY repost, I wanted to change the title of my other post
Teak wooden device with glass for containing acids and carbon(?) rod

Golden name plate (1.6 gr) says 'J.A.F. Best instrumentmaker Leeuwarden' (The netherlands)
Dimensions (without steel handle)
Height: 11.5cm
Witdth: 13cm
Depth: 13cm

Materials:
Bakelite, teakwood, steel, copper and gold. (18.2 gr in total nameplate included)

The two conductors above the acid are made of gold.
Hidden Under the name plate is a very tiny logo with a lightbulb the text says 'schutz marke' (Registered name in German)  

Alot of traces from using it on it. even on the golden name plate and inside of the case. Also the bottom side of the gold is deteriated from the acids used.

It has 2 tiny locks, one of them 'hidden' Only visible when the case is opened. no keys.

Nice to show, but I am also interested, has anyone more info?
About the materials used to make electricity, how they used it, and wwhat it would be worth. not sure if it s worth taxation and insuring it.
Thanks in advance

8
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Smith,_John_Thomas_(1766-1833)_(DNB00)
 sister projects: Wikipedia article.
SMITH, JOHN THOMAS (1766–1833), topographical draughtsman and antiquary, son of Nathaniel Smith, a sculptor who afterwards became a printseller at the sign of Rembrandt's Head in May's Buildings, St. Martin's Lane, was born on 23 June 1766 in a hackney coach in which his mother was returning home from a visit to her brother in Seven Dials, London. His father was then chief assistant to Joseph Nollekens, R.A., the sculptor, whose studio young Smith entered in 1778, but left it in 1781 to become a pupil of John Keyse Sherwin [q. v.], the mezzotint-engraver. At the end of three years he gave up engraving and found employment in making topographical drawings of London for Mr. Crowle, and others in the neighbourhood of Windsor for Mr. Richard Wyatt. He had thoughts of going on the stage, but eventually settled down in 1788 as a drawingmaster at Edmonton. In 1791 he began the compilation of his favourite work, ‘Antiquities of London and its Environs,’ which was finished in 1800. He returned to London in 1795, and for some time practised as a portrait-painter and engraver. In 1797 he published ‘Remarks on Rural Scenery,’ with twenty etchings of cottages by himself, and in 1807 the ‘Antiquities of Westminster,’ for part of which the descriptive text was written by John Sidney Hawkins [q. v.]; but a disagreement having arisen between him and Smith, it was continued by the latter, who prefixed an ‘Advertisement’ describing the dispute. Smith's statement was challenged by Hawkins in a ‘Correct Statement and Vindication’ of his conduct, which was answered by Smith in a ‘Vindication’ (1808), to which Hawkins issued a ‘Reply’ (1808). ‘Sixty-two additional Plates’ to this work were published in 1809. There followed ‘The Ancient Topography of London,’ begun in 1810 and completed in 1815.
In September 1816 Smith was appointed to succeed William Alexander (1767–1816) [q. v.] as keeper of the prints and drawings in the British Museum, and retained that office until his death. His official duties did not interfere with the continuance of his literary work. In 1817 he published ‘Vagabondiana, or Anecdotes of Mendicant Wanderers through the Streets of London,’ illustrated with portraits of notorious beggars drawn and etched by himself from the life; an introduction was written by Francis Douce [q. v.] His last and best known work was ‘Nollekens and his Times,’ issued in 1828. This has been said to be ‘perhaps the most candid biography ever published in the English language,’ and was probably influenced by the smallness of the legacy left to him by Nollekens, who appointed him co-executor of his will with Sir William Beechey and Francis Douce. A new edition, with an introduction by Mr. Edmund Gosse, appeared in 1894. After Smith's death there appeared his ‘Cries of London’ (1839), with plates etched by himself, edited by John Bowyer Nichols [q. v.]; his entertaining and discursive ‘Book for a Rainy Day’ (1845, new edit. by W. Whitten, 1905); and his ‘Antiquarian Ramble in the Streets of London’ (1846), edited by Charles Mackay [q. v.]
Smith died at 22 University Street, Tottenham Court Road, London, from inflammation of the lungs, on 8 March 1833, and was buried in St. George's burial-ground in the Bayswater Road.
A three-quarter portrait was painted by John Jackson, R.A. A drawing by the same artist was engraved by William Skelton [q. v.] and prefixed to the ‘Cries of London,’ 1839.
[Smith's Book for a Rainy Day, 1828; Memoir by John Bowyer Nichols, prefixed to Smith's Cries of London, 1839; Short Account, by Edmund Gosse, prefixed to Smith's Nollekens and his Times, 1894; Gent. Mag. 1833, i. 641–4; Redgrave's Dictionary of Artists of the English School, 1878; Bryan's Dictionary of Painters and Engravers, ed. Graves and Armstrong, 1886–9, ii. 508.]


I did NOT post this to proof anything I am here for advice..

This whole last week was pretty annoying, When I make a claim I do that when I am 100% sure.

Engraver was even in the link you gave.
If these are the reactions I can expect I will take it offline.
Newbee dont like much yet here..


 At the end of three years he gave up engraving and found employment in making topographical drawings of London for Mr. Crowle
I am just invited for a tv show on national tv. hour ago.

9
He engraved as a to be hired job for 3-4 tears untill he decided to switch his career..

10
I know.. IT sound stunningly unbelieveable!!! I am SO AWAR !!

I am busy on my quest to convince clock specialists..

I have 3 things actually:

Gold = tested, worth 18.400euros (One jeweller told me that in that time you could have bought half london)
Engravings In silver = By Thomas Smith London (google him)  = checked by antique specialists. They were very excited.
And the lock + case = No clock expert believes the 2 things above. So they say:
No impossible.. next!

I am looking for some specialst to back me up. I dont life near the largest cities. Just returned from Groningen universtiy. Also very amazed.

Anyone any tips on how to convince christies of sothebys from a distance?

Thanks people!

11
Hello,

I only look for info of the details. not opinjions about gold or the quality of the engravings.

Thanks for the help anyway, Domnt  get me wrong.
Thanks for the input. Buit in the meanwhile I have been forwarded to among others the British museum.
I have done that in the meanwhile.


This by antique specialsts. And old print sellers (Smnith made envgravings for prints)

I did checking for a long time also. Thomas was engraver in his early years. (1778-1781)
The engravings seemn original according to expertts. You as many opther sent a very ugly replica from after 1900. look:

http://img198.imageshack.us/slideshow/webplayer.php?id=voorkantk.jpg

I did not post this to discuss the authenticity. Buit to receive further info. 

12
I am looking for addittionall info on this one please.
It is so specific no one can actually really help me.

Recently discovered:
Teak wooden device with glass for containing acids and carbon(?) rod

Golden name plate (1.6 gr) says 'J.A.F. Best instrumentmaker Leeuwarden' (The netherlands)
Dimensions (without steel handle)
Height: 11.5cm
Witdth: 13cm
Depth: 13cm

Materials:
Bakelite, teakwood, steel, copper and gold. (18.2 gr in total)

The two elements above the acid are made of gold.
Betheath the name plate is a very tiny lkogo with a lightbulb the text says 'schutz marke' (Registered name in German)

Alot of traces from using it on it. even on the golden name plate and inside of the case. Also the bottom side of the gold is deteriated from the acids used.

It has 2 tiny locks, one of them 'hidden' Only visible when the case is opened.

Anyone some more info?

I also have this posted:

http://www.collectorsweekly.com/stories/64658-walnut-mantel-clock-1780-silver-engrav

13
Update:
I have been forwarded to: Christies, Sotheby's and The British Museum

Old print sellers and antique specialist were very, VERY  excited abioout the engravings.


Recently discovered and stored at the bank.

The local old print shops and antique stores allready told me its autenthic. (Engravings)
Jewellers told me the gold is real, I knew it allready when I went there.

It is a late 18th century walnut bracket clock. In perfect shape.
Engraved by a famous man, Smith, John Thomas (1766-1833)


The time mechanisme has been replaced, probably twice before.
It does work, but stops ticking.


I don't know alot about it. I recently discovered that is was gold. It maight have been painted in WWII. When the Germans invaded Europe
There are alot of these models, from around 1900. Replica's this is a real one. serial number 23, No idea what its worth. It is stored in a save in the bank. Any additional info is welcome

Thanks in advance.

Futher claims about the gold and authenticity will be ignored. (Only because I will have a day's job from it) And it is unbelieveable, I know it !!!!!   ;D
I have spent a whole week trying to convince people on a distance. Jewellers and antique specialsts say it is real and / or authentic.

The rest of my items is to be and will be found here.
http://www.collectorsweekly.com/user/Hansel/posts

Pages: [1]