Hello!
I have a set, 8, of Arthur Singer bird prints. All are mint, in original frames.
While researching possible value, I see a variety of these prints in complete sets or partial, with a big range of prices.
One is around 175.00 complete, "signed".
Here's what is bugging me...
most of the internet postings/ads say the prints are "signed".
It looks to me like the signature is part of the print. If I see a pencil or ink signature, (besides the printed one) I feel that is a true signature. So, if an artist signed his/her work, originally, and it is part of the print, how is that viewed that as "signed" ?
I attached 4 pictures including two of signatures that appear to be hand signed. Those differ from others that look more as part of the print.
Thank you!