Me too.
The fact is that political opinion posts usually reflect the owner's perception bias and not "The Truth" that they believe they have a corner on.
We both have our perception biases.
Did Byrne contradict himself on this particular incident, or was it something else? Not quite sure what the "it" in question is. Is there any political book that is completely undisputed? I'd hate to dispute anything written by, for example, Hillary because of that thing about reposting unreliable information. So I don't.
So apparently by bringing this up I'm dismissed as "far right," which sounds kind of like a marginalizing, left-handed slur. Again, perception bias.
I do agree that a political discussion, although it might temporarily liven up the board, is not a good idea. The typical result is raised blood pressure while everyone's opinions hardens and nobody is convinced of anything.
Selah.