« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: two portraits  (Read 2171 times)

christoph.77

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
two portraits
« on: August 05, 2010, 01:15:43 pm »
What I know:  -style somewhere between 1680 and 1750

-similar style to that of John Hoppner

Would like to know who the subjects are and the artist if possible.

Thanks


Logged

hosman321

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2231
  • Karma: +5/-0
    • View Profile
Re: two portraits
« Reply #1 on: August 05, 2010, 09:20:05 pm »
Great portraits! Are you able to post pictures of the back of them? That could help with dating. If they are really old, the frames do not look original. They look like they have been made to look old. Something about the expressions on their faces makes me believe they are early 1900's. But I am definitely not an expert. Do they belong to you or are they currently in an auction? Just asking because of the numbers on them. Hope someone here can help!
« Last Edit: August 05, 2010, 09:29:26 pm by hosman321 »
Logged

hosman321

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2231
  • Karma: +5/-0
    • View Profile
Re: two portraits
« Reply #2 on: August 05, 2010, 09:37:48 pm »
Here are some examples of really old frames. Notice the chipping and splitting of the wood. And the crackling of the finish. Then again, those could be old portraits with new matching frames. Pictures of the backs would definitely help. :)
http://www.themagazineantiques.com/news-opinion/discovery/2009-12-22/looking-at-european-frames-gene-karraker/
Logged

regularjoe2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1290
  • Karma: +4/-0
    • View Profile
Re: two portraits
« Reply #3 on: August 05, 2010, 10:26:24 pm »
Welcome to the forum , christoph77 .

For starters , IMO , these two portraits were done by different artists .

The painting of the male was done with a more critical/dimentional eye than the portrait of the female (proportional accuracy of the physiology of the aspects of the human face differ considerably) .

I'd suggest that you inspect , with a 10x (or higher) magnifying glass/loupe , both painting & look for the same types of brush-strokes .
I suspect that you'll find that they differ quite a bit .

That being said , I'll agree with hosman321 about really liking to view a few images of the backs of your paintings , so as to have a few more clues to go on .

They are certainly a couple of cool-looking items .

Thanks for posting them here !
Logged

KC

  • Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11660
  • Karma: +93/-0
  • Forever Blessed!
    • View Profile
Re: two portraits
« Reply #4 on: August 05, 2010, 11:24:17 pm »
Agree with the other antiquers on here.....please post some pics of the back!
Logged
I'm from the South - but please don't mistake my Southern Manners/Accent/Charm as a weakness!

christoph.77

  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: two portraits
« Reply #5 on: August 09, 2010, 09:47:42 am »
They are not in auction but were purchased at an antique market for about $160.

I will try to get back to you soon with pictures of the backs. 

Thank you all for your insight and assistance.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »